ShareholderStockholder Recommendation of Board Candidates. Any shareholderstockholder desiring to submit a recommendation for consideration by the nominatingNominating and governance committeeCorporate Governance Committee of a candidate for election to the Board may do so by submitting that recommendation in writing to the Board not later 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the date on

14

which the proxy materials for the prior year’s annual meeting were first sent to shareholders.stockholders. However, if the date of an annual meeting has been changed by more than 30 days from the anniversary date of the

prior year’s annual meeting, the recommendation must be received within a reasonable time before the Company begins to print and mail its proxy materials for that annual meeting. In addition, the recommendation should be accompanied by the following information: (i) the name and address of the nominating shareholderstockholder and the person that the nominating shareholderstockholder is recommending for consideration as a candidate for Board membership; (ii) the number of shares of voting stock of the Company that are owned by the nominating shareholder,stockholder, his or her recommended candidate and any other shareholdersstockholders known by the nominating shareholderstockholder to be supporting the nomination of that candidate; (iii) a description of any arrangements or understandings that relate to the election of directors of the Company, between the nominating shareholder,stockholder, or any person that (directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries) controls, or is controlled by, or is under common control with, such shareholder,stockholder, on the one hand, and the person that the nominating shareholderstockholder is recommending for election to the Board or any other person or persons (naming each such person), on the other hand; (iv) such other information regarding the recommended candidate as would be required to be included in a proxy statement filed pursuant to the proxy rules of the SEC; and (v) the written consent of the recommended candidate to be named as a nominee and, if nominated and elected, to serve as a director. The Board and the nominatingNominating and governance committeeCorporate Governance Committee make no distinction between whether a candidate is recommended by a shareholderstockholder or by management and the Board and the nominatingNominating and governance committeeCorporate Governance Committee apply the same process and criteria in evaluating a candidate recommended by a shareholderstockholder as it would for a candidate recommended by management.

ShareholderStockholder Nominations. Our Bylawsbylaws provide that any record shareholder alsostockholder may nominate, at any annual meeting of shareholders,stockholders, one or more candidates for election to the Board of Directors, by giving the Company written notice (addressed to the Corporate Secretary of the Company at the Company’s principal offices) of such shareholder’sstockholder’s intention to do so not laterless than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the date on which the Company’s proxy materialsstatement for the prior year’s annual meeting werewas first sentreleased to shareholders. If,stockholders, provided however, that in the event that no annual meeting was held in that prior year or the date of the annual meeting has been changed by more than 30 calendar days from the first anniversary ofdate contemplated at the datetime of the prior year’s meeting, then suchproxy statement, to be timely, the stockholder notice must have beenbe received not later thanby the close of business on the tenthlater of (i) the 90th day prior to such annual meeting, or (ii) the 10th day following the daydate on which a public announcement of the date of such annual meeting is made.first mailed or is first publicly announces. Such notice must be accompanied by the samestatements and other information described in the immediately preceding paragraph, regarding each such candidateCompany’s Bylaws, including the following items:

Stockholders are advised to carefully review our Bylaws,bylaws, which contain a description of the information required to be submitted, as well as the advance notice and other requirements that apply to nominations by shareholdersstockholders of candidates for election to the Board. Any shareholderstockholder nomination at any annual meeting that does not comply with these Bylawthe requirements set forth in our bylaws will be ineffective and disregarded.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires each ofand the related rules and regulations, our directors and executive officers and any person who may ownbeneficial owners of more than 10% of any registered class of our common stock (a “10% Shareholder”),equity securities, are required to file reports with the SEC containing information regarding such person’sof their ownership, and any changes in the ownership, of our shares of common stock and of options, warrants or any other rights to purchase shares of our common stock. Our directors and executive officers and any 10% Shareholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all forms that each has filed with the SEC pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act.

To our knowledge, based solely on a review of copies of Section 16(a) reports furnished to us and on written representations from such reporting persons, during 2014,2016, all of those persons complied with the Section 16(a) filing requirements, except for a Form 4 filed to report a purchase of 500 shares of the Company’s common stock by Warren Fix, which was inadvertently filed two (2) days late.

15

AMENDMENT OF THE COMPANY’S ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

TO INCREASE THE AUTHORIZED NUMBER OF SHARES

OF COMMON STOCK TO 70,000,000 SHARES

(Proposal No. 2)

Article Three of the Company’s Articles of Incorporation, as amended (the “Articles of Incorporation”), currently authorizes the issuance, by Board action, of up to 20,000,000 million shares of our common stock, par value $0.001 per share, and up to 5,000,000 shares of our preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share. As of September 14, 2015, a total of 15,962,686 shares of common stock were issued and outstanding and a total of 1,686,786 shares of common stock were reserved for future issuance under the Company’s shareholder-approved equity incentive plans, leaving a total of just 2,350,528 shares of common stock available for sales of shares in the future.

The Board of Directors has approved, subject to shareholder approval, an amendment to Article Three of the Company’s Articles of Incorporation to increase the authorized number of shares of our common stock to 70,000,000 shares (the “Share Increase Amendment”). The authorized number of shares of preferred stock will remain unchanged at 5,000,000 shares.

The increase in the authorized number of shares of common stock is intended to ensure that the Company will continue to have an adequate number of authorized and unissued shares of common stock for future use. While the Company does not have any current intention to sell or issue the shares contemplated by the Share Increase Amendment, this amendment would give the Company the necessary flexibility to issue shares of common stock to raise additional capital to support the Company’s growth initiatives, for general corporate purposes, to use as consideration in business acquisitions, and pursuant to equity-based incentive compensation plans. Having such shares available for issuance in the future will enable us to issue and sell shares of common stock without the expense and delay of a shareholders meeting (except when shareholder approval is required under applicable law or NASDAQ rules). Among other things, any such delay could cause us to lose out on acquisition opportunities when we are competing for those acquisitions with other companies that do have available shares.

Additional shares of common stock authorized for issuance by the Share Increase Amendment, if and when issued, will have the same rights and privileges as the shares of common stock that are currently owned by our shareholders. Our common stock has no preemptive rights to purchase common stock or other securities. In addition, under California law, our shareholders are not entitled to dissenters’ or appraisal rights in connection with the proposed increase in the number of shares of common stock authorized for future issuance.

If the Share Increase Amendment is approved by our shareholders at the Annual Meeting, then, paragraph (a) of Article Three of the Articles of Incorporation will be amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows:

“(a) The total number of shares which the corporation shall have authority to issue is 75,000,000 shares, comprised of 70,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, and 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share.”

The proposed increase in the number of authorized shares of the Company’s common stock will not, by itself, change the number of shares of common stock outstanding, nor will it have any immediate dilutive effect on the Company’s current shareholders. However, the issuance of additional shares of common stock authorized by the Share Increase Amendment may occur at times or under circumstances that could result in a dilutive effect on earnings per share, book value per share or the percentage voting or ownership interest of the present holders of the Company’s common stock, none of whom have preemptive rights to subscribe for additional shares that the Company may issue.

Although an increase in the number of authorized shares of the Company’s common stock could, under certain circumstances, also be construed as having an anti-takeover effect (for example, by permitting easier dilution of the stock ownership of a person seeking to effect a change in the composition of the Board of Directors or contemplating a tender offer or other transaction resulting in our acquisition by another company), the proposed increase in authorized shares and in authorized shares of common stock is not in response to any effort by any person or group to accumulate our common stock or to obtain control of us by any means. In addition, the proposal is not part of any plan by our Board of Directors to recommend or implement a series of anti-takeover measures.

16

If the Share Increase Amendment is approved by our shareholders, then, it will become effective upon filing of a Certificate of Amendment of the Articles of Incorporation of the Company with the California Secretary of State. However, if the shareholders also approve the reincorporation of the Company from California to Delaware (Proposal No. 3) at the Annual Meeting, then the Board of Directors may choose, instead, to give effect to the increase in the authorized number of shares, not by filing the Certificate of Amendment of Articles of Incorporation with the California Secretary of State, but by providing, in the Certificate of Incorporation to be filed in Delaware in connection with the reincorporation, that the Company’s authorized capital stock shall consist of 75,000,000 million shares, comprised of 70,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, and 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share. Our shareholders will be deemed to have approved this method for effectuating the Share Increase Amendment if they approve both the Share Increase Amendment and the Reincorporation Proposal.

However, even if the Company’s shareholders approve the Share Increase Amendment, the Board retains the discretion under California law not to implement that Amendment. Nevertheless, the Board has no reason to expect that, if the Share Increase Amendment is approved by our shareholders, it would not implement that Amendment.

Vote Required for Approval and Board Recommendation

The affirmative vote of the majority of the outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote on the Share Increase Amendment is required to amend the Articles of Incorporation to increase the authorized number of shares of common stock to 70,000,000 shares.

The Board unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” approval of the Share Increase Amendment

to increase the authorized number of shares of common stock from 20,000,000 shares to 70,000,000 shares.

17

REINCORPORATION OF THE COMPANY FROM CALIFORNIA TO DELAWARE

(Proposal No. 3)

Introduction

Our Board has unanimously approved a change in our state of incorporation from California to Delaware (the “Reincorporation”), subject to the approval of our shareholders. If approved, the Reincorporation will be effectuated pursuant to the terms of a merger agreement providing for us to merge into a newly formed wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company incorporated in the State of Delaware (“FFI-Delaware”). The name of the Company after the Reincorporation will remain First Foundation Inc. For purposes of the discussion below, the Company as it currently exists as a corporation organized under the laws of the State of California is sometimes referred to as “FFI-California” or as “we” or “us.”

Shareholders are urged to read this proposal carefully, including the exhibits attached to this Proxy Statement, before voting on the Reincorporation Proposal. The following discussion summarizes material provisions of the proposed Reincorporation. This summary is subject to and qualified in its entirety by the Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Reincorporation Agreement”) that will be entered into by FFI-California and FFI-Delaware in substantially the form attached hereto asExhibit A, the Certificate of Incorporation of FFI-Delaware to be effective immediately following the Reincorporation (the “Delaware Certificate”), in substantially the form attached hereto asExhibit B, and the Bylaws of FFI-Delaware to be effective immediately following the Reincorporation (the “Delaware Bylaws”), in substantially the form attached hereto asExhibit C. Copies of the Articles of Incorporation of FFI-California filed in California, as amended to date (the “California Articles”), and the Bylaws of FFI-California, as amended to date (the “California Bylaws”), are publicly available as exhibits to the reports we have filed with the SEC and also are available for inspection at our principal executive offices. Additionally, we will send copies to shareholders free of charge upon written request to First Foundation Inc., Attention: Corporate Secretary, at 18101 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 700, Irvine, California 92612.

Reasons for the Reincorporation

Because state corporate law governs the internal affairs of a corporation, choice of a state domicile is an extremely important decision for a public company. Management and boards of directors of corporations look to state corporate law, and judicial interpretations of state law, to guide their decision-making on many key issues, including determining appropriate governance policies and procedures, ensuring that boards satisfy their fiduciary obligations to shareholders, and evaluating key strategic alternatives for a corporation, including mergers, acquisitions and divestitures. Our Board and management believe that it is essential for us to be able to draw upon well-established principles of corporate governance in making legal and business decisions. The prominence and predictability of Delaware corporate law provide a reliable foundation on which our governance decisions can be based, and we believe that our shareholders will benefit from the responsiveness of Delaware corporate law and the Delaware judiciary to their needs and to those of the corporation they own. The principal factors the Board considered in deciding to pursue and recommending that our shareholder approve the Reincorporation are summarized below:

Highly Developed and Predictable Corporate Law. Delaware has adopted comprehensive and flexible corporate laws that are revised regularly to meet changing business circumstances. The Delaware legislature is sensitive to and experienced in addressing issues regarding corporate law and is especially responsive to developments in modern corporate law. The Delaware Secretary of State is viewed as particularly flexible and responsive in its administration of the filings required for mergers, acquisitions and other corporate transactions. Delaware has become a preferred domicile for many major American corporations and its corporate law and administrative practices have become comparatively well-known and widely understood. In addition, Delaware case law provides a well-developed body of law defining the proper duties and decision making processes expected of boards of directors in evaluating potential or proposed extraordinary corporate transactions. As a result of these factors, it is anticipated that Delaware law will

18

provide greater efficiency, predictability and flexibility in our legal affairs than is presently available under California law.

Access to Specialized Courts. Delaware offers a system of specialized Chancery Courts to adjudicate cases involving corporate law issues. These courts have developed considerable expertise in dealing with corporate legal issues, as well as a substantial and influential body of case law construing Delaware’s corporate law and have streamlined procedures and processes that help provide relatively quick decisions. In contrast, California does not have a similar specialized court established to hear only corporate law cases. Instead, disputes involving questions of California corporate law are either heard by the California Superior Court, the general trial court in California that hears all manner of cases, from criminal to civil (including personal injury and marital dissolution cases) or, if federal jurisdiction exists, a federal district court. As a result, corporate law cases brought in California may not proceed as expeditiously as cases brought in Delaware and the outcomes in such courts may be less consistent and predictable.

Enhanced Ability to Attract and Retain Directors and Officers. The Board believes that the Reincorporation will enhance our ability to attract and retain qualified directors and officers, as well as encourage directors and officers to continue to make independent decisions in good faith on behalf of the Company. We are in a competitive industry and compete for talented individuals to serve on our management team and on our Board. The majority of public companies are incorporated in Delaware. Not only is Delaware law more familiar to directors, it also offers greater certainty and stability from the perspective of those who serve as corporate officers and directors. The parameters of director and officer liability have been more extensively addressed in Delaware court decisions and, therefore, are better defined and better understood than under California law. The Board believes that the Reincorporation will provide appropriate protection for shareholders from possible abuses by directors and officers, while enhancing our ability to recruit and retain directors and officers. In this regard, it should be noted that directors’ personal liability is not, and cannot be, eliminated under Delaware law for intentional misconduct, bad faith conduct or any transaction from which the director derives an improper personal benefit. We believe that the better understood and comparatively stable corporate environment afforded by Delaware law will enable us to compete more effectively with other public companies in the recruitment of talented and experienced directors and officers.

Adoption of Majority Vote Standard for Board of Director Elections

Based on the Board’s belief that directors should be elected by majority vote, the Delaware Bylaws include a majority-voting standard for uncontested director elections. This means that, in an uncontested election, a nominee for director must receive a “majority of the votes cast” in the election of directors for his or her election to the Board. The majority vote standard will require any director who was elected to the Board by a plurality, but not a majority, of the votes cast in an uncontested election to tender his or her resignation from the Board. The Board will then have the choice of either accepting or rejecting the resignation. However, if the Board decides to reject the resignation, it will be required to disclose publicly the reasons for that decision. An “uncontested election” is an election in which the number of nominees for director is not greater than the number of directors to be elected. A “majority of the votes cast” means that the number of votes “FOR” a director-nominee must exceed 50% of the total number of votes cast in his or her election. Shares voted as “withhold authority” to vote on the election of a nominee will count as votes cast against the nominee’s election. On the other hand, in a contested election, directors will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast by the shareholders entitled to vote in the election of directors. A “contested election” is an election in which the number of nominees for director is greater than the number of directors to be elected.

Mechanics of the Reincorporation

The Reincorporation will be effectuated by the merger of FFI-California with and into FFI-Delaware, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company that recently has been incorporated under the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”) for purposes of the Reincorporation. The Company, as it currently exists as a California corporation, will cease to exist as a result of the merger, and FFI-Delaware will be the surviving corporation and will continue to operate our businesses as they were operated prior to the Reincorporation. The existing holders of our common stock will own all of the outstanding shares of FFI-Delaware common stock, and there will be no change in number of shares owned by or in the percentage ownership of any shareholder as a result of the Reincorporation. Assuming approval of the Reincorporation Proposal, we currently intend to effectuate the Reincorporation as soon as reasonably practicable following the Annual Meeting.

19

At the time and date on which the Reincorporation becomes effective (the “Effective Time”), we will be governed by the Delaware Certificate, the Delaware Bylaws and the DGCL. Although the Delaware Certificate and the Delaware Bylaws contain many provisions that are similar to the provisions of the California Articles and the California Bylaws, they do include certain provisions that are different from the provisions contained in the California Articles and the California Bylaws or under the California General Corporation Law (the “CGCL”), as described in more detail below.

Changes to the Business of the Company as a Result of the Reincorporation

Other than the change in corporate domicile, the Reincorporation will not result in any change in the business, physical location, management, assets, liabilities or capitalization of the Company, nor will it result in any change in location of our current officers or employees. Upon consummation of the Reincorporation, our daily business operations will continue as they are presently conducted at our principal executive offices located at 18101 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 700, Irvine, California 92612 and at our wealth management and banking offices. The consolidated financial condition and results of operations of FFI-Delaware immediately after consummation of the Reincorporation will be the same as those of FFI-California immediately prior to the consummation of the Reincorporation. In addition, upon the effectiveness of the Reincorporation, the Board of Directors of FFI-Delaware will be comprised of the persons who were elected to the Board of Directors of FFI-California at the Annual Meeting and will continue to serve until the next annual shareholders’ meeting and until their successors are elected. There will be no changes in our executive officers or in their titles or responsibilities. Upon effectiveness of the Reincorporation, FFI-Delaware will be the successor in interest to FFI-California, and the shareholders will become shareholders of FFI-Delaware, owning the same number of shares of its common stock as they owned of FFI-California’s common stock.

All of our employee benefit and incentive compensation plans existing immediately prior to the Reincorporation will be continued by FFI-Delaware, and each outstanding option to purchase shares of FFI-California’s common stock will be converted into an option to purchase the same number of shares of FFI-Delaware’s common stock on the same terms and subject to the same conditions. The registration statements of FFI-California on file with the SEC immediately prior to the Reincorporation will be assumed by FFI-Delaware, and the shares of FFI-Delaware will continue to be listed on NASDAQ.

FFI-CALIFORNIA SHARE CERTIFICATES WILL AUTOMATICALLY REPRESENT SHARES OF FFI-DELAWARE UPON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE REINCORPORATION, AND SHAREHOLDERS WILL NOT BE REQUIRED TO SURRENDER OR EXCHANGE THEIR FFI-CALIFORNIA SHARE CERTIFICATES AS A RESULT OF THE REINCORPORATION.

The Reincorporation Agreement provides that the Board may abandon the Reincorporation at any time prior to the Effective Time if the Board determines that the Reincorporation is inadvisable for any reason. For example, the DGCL or the California General Corporation Law, or CGCL, may be changed to reduce the benefits that the Board is seeking to achieve through the Reincorporation, or the costs of operating as a Delaware corporation may be increased, although we do not know of any such changes under consideration. The Reincorporation Agreement may be amended at any time prior to the Effective Time, either before or after the shareholders have voted to adopt the proposal, subject to applicable law. We will re-solicit shareholder approval of the Reincorporation if the terms of the Reincorporation Agreement are materially changed.

Possible Negative Considerations

Notwithstanding the belief of the Board as to the benefits to our shareholders of the Reincorporation, it should be noted that Delaware law has been criticized by some commentators and institutional shareholders on the grounds that it does not afford minority shareholders the same substantive rights and protections as are available in a number of other states, including California. In addition, the Delaware Certificate and the Delaware Bylaws, in comparison to the California Articles and the California Bylaws, contain or eliminate certain provisions that may have the effect of reducing the rights of minority shareholders. The Reincorporation may make it more difficult for minority shareholders to elect directors and influence our policies and to call special shareholder meetings. It should also be noted that the interests of the Board, management and affiliated shareholders in voting on the Reincorporation proposal may not be the same as those of unaffiliated shareholders. In addition, franchise taxes payable by us in Delaware may be greater than in California.

20

The members of the Board have considered the potential disadvantages of the Reincorporation and they have unanimously concluded that the potential benefits of the Reincorporation outweigh the possible disadvantages of the Reincorporation.

Differences between the Charters and Bylaws of FFI-California and FFI-Delaware

The following is a comparison of provisions in the Articles of Incorporation and the Bylaws of FFI-California and provisions in the Certificate of Incorporation and the Bylaws of FFI-Delaware, as well as certain provisions of California law and Delaware law. The comparison summarizes the important differences, but is not intended to list all differences, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to those documents and to the respective General Corporation Laws of the States of California and Delaware. Shareholders are encouraged to read the Certificate of Incorporation and the Bylaws of FFI-Delaware and the Articles of Incorporation and the Bylaws of FFI-California, in their entirety. Copies of the Certificate of Incorporation and the Bylaws of FFI-Delaware are attached as Exhibits B and C, respectively, to this proxy statement, and the Articles of Incorporation and the Bylaws of FFI-California are filed publicly as exhibits to the periodic reports we have previously filed with the SEC.

21

22

23

24

25

Interest of the Company’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Reincorporation

The shareholders should be aware that certain of our directors and executive officers may have interests in the transaction that are different from, or in addition to, the interests of the shareholders generally. For example, the

26

Reincorporation may provide officers and directors of the Corporation with more clarity and certainty in the reduction of their potential personal liability, and to strengthen the ability of directors to resist takeover bids. The Board has considered these interests, among other matters, in reaching its decision to approve the Reincorporation and to recommend that our shareholders vote in favor of this proposal.

Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences

The following discussion summarizes certain United States (“U.S.”) federal income tax consequences of the Reincorporation to holders of our common stock. The discussion is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), regulations promulgated under the Code by the U.S. Treasury Department (including proposed and temporary regulations), rulings, current administrative interpretations and official pronouncements of the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”), and judicial decisions, all as currently in effect and all of which are subject to differing interpretations or to change, possibly with retroactive effect. Such change could materially and adversely affect the tax consequences described below. No assurance can be given that the IRS would not assert, or that a court would not sustain, a position contrary to any of the tax consequences described herein.

This discussion is for general information only, and does not purport to discuss all aspects of U.S. federal income taxation that may be important to a particular holder in light of its investment or tax circumstances or to holders subject to special tax rules, such as partnerships, subchapter S corporations or other pass-through entities, banks, financial institutions, tax-exempt entities, insurance companies, regulated investment companies, real estate investment trusts, trusts and estates, dealers in stocks, securities or currencies, traders in securities that have elected to use the mark-to-market method of accounting for their securities, persons holding our common stock as part of an integrated transaction, including a “straddle,” “hedge,” “constructive sale,” or “conversion transaction,” persons whose functional currency for tax purposes is not the U.S. dollar, persons who acquired our common stock pursuant to the exercise of stock options or otherwise as compensation and persons subject to the alternative minimum tax provisions of the Code. This discussion does not include any description of the tax laws of any state or local governments, or of any foreign government, that may be applicable to a particular holder.

This discussion is directed solely to holders that hold our common stock as capital assets within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code, which generally means as property held for investment. In addition, the following discussion only addresses “U.S. persons” for U.S. federal income tax purposes, generally defined as beneficial owners of our common stock who are:

If an entity or arrangement treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes holds our common stock, the U.S. federal income tax treatment of a partner generally will depend on the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. A partner of a partnership holding our common stock should consult its own tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences to the partner of the Reincorporation.

This discussion does not purport to be a complete analysis of all of the Reincorporation’s tax consequences that may be relevant to holders. We urge you to consult your own tax advisor regarding your particular circumstances and the U.S. federal income and other federal tax consequences to you of the Reincorporation, as well as any tax consequences arising under the laws of any state, local, foreign or other tax jurisdiction and the possible effects of changes in U.S. federal or other tax laws.

We have not requested a ruling from the IRS or an opinion of counsel regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the Reincorporation. However, we believe:

27

Vote Required

Approval of the Reincorporation requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.

Shareholders are urged to read this proposal carefully, including all of the related Exhibits attached to this Proxy Statement, before voting on the Reincorporation. The discussion above is qualified in its entirety by the Merger Agreement in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, the Delaware Certificate in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit B, and the Delaware Bylaws in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit C.

Recommendation of the Board of Directors

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” approval of the Reincorporation.

28

FIRST FOUNDATION INC. 2015 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

(Proposal No. 4)

Introduction

We are asking our shareholders to approve the First Foundation Inc. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2015 Plan”) at this year’s Annual Meeting. If approved, the 2015 Plan will increase, by 750,000 shares, the number of shares of common stock that will be available for the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights (or SARs), shares of restricted stock, restricted stock units (or RSUs), stock bonus awards and performance awards (collectively, “Equity Incentive Awards” or “Equity Incentives”) to the Company’s executive officers, other key employees and directors, as well as to consultants, advisors or other independent contractors (collectively, “outside service providers”). Based on the recommendation of the Board’s compensation committee, comprised solely of independent non-employee directors, the Board of Directors unanimously adopted the 2015 Plan on September 29, 2015, subject to and effective upon the approval of the Plan by our shareholders.

The 2015 Plan is intended to replace our 2007 Stock Incentive Plan and 2007 Management Incentive Plan (the “Prior Plans”). Therefore, if the shareholders approve the 2015 Plan:

Burn Rate and Overhang

In setting and recommending to our shareholders the number of shares to authorize under the 2015 Plan, our Board of Directors and the compensation committee considered the historical number of equity awards granted under the Prior Plans as well as our average burn rate for the preceding three fiscal years and the overhang that would exist assuming the 2015 Plan is approved by our shareholders at the Annual Meeting.

Burn Rate

The burn rate is the ratio of the number of shares underlying outstanding Equity Incentive Awards granted under the Prior Plans in a particular year to our weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding at the corresponding fiscal year-end. Set forth below are the Company’s annual burn rates for each of the years in, and the Company’s average burn rate for, the three years ended December 31, 2014:

As the above table indicates our three year average burn rate was 0.52%.

29

Overhang

As of September 14, 2015, a total of 1,423,764 shares were subject to outstanding Equity Incentives, and 263,022 shares remained available for additional grants of Equity Incentives, under the Prior Plans and a total of 15,962,686 shares of our common stock were outstanding. An additional 750,000 shares will become available for future Equity Incentive grants if the 2015 Plan is approved by our shareholders at the Annual Meeting.

We calculated “overhang” as the percentage obtained by (a) dividing the sum of the number of shares underlying outstanding Equity Incentive Awards and the shares available for additional Equity Incentives under the Prior Plans as of September 14, 2015, and the 750,000 shares that will become available for Equity Incentive Awards as a result of the approval of the 2015 Plan, by (b) the sum of all of those shares and the number of shares outstanding as of September 14, 2015. That overhang percentage is 13.2%.

Purposes of and Reasons for Adoption of the 2015 Plan

The primary purposes of the 2015 Plan are to enhance our ability, through the grant of Equity Incentive Awards:

As of September 14, 2015, there were only 263,022 shares of our common stock still available for the grant of Equity Incentives under the Prior Plans. Additionally, the Prior Plans expire in 2017. Without additional shares, we would be at a competitive disadvantage in seeking to retain and to recruit officers and other key employees and directors on whose efforts and skills our future success will depend. Moreover, we will be forced to consider cash replacement alternatives to provide a market-competitive total compensation packages necessary to attract, retain and motivate the employee talent critical to our growth and future success. These cash replacement alternatives could, among other things, (i) reduce the cash available to grow our businesses, both organically and by acquisitions, (ii) cause a loss of motivation by employees to achieve superior performance over the longer term, (iii) reduce the incentive of employees and directors to remain in the service of our Company, and (iv) make it more difficult to align the financial interests of our officers and other key employees with the financial interests of our shareholders.

After carefully forecasting our anticipated growth rate for the next few years and considering our historical forfeiture rates, we currently believe that the share reserve under the 2015 Plan will be sufficient for us to make anticipated grants of equity incentive awards under our current compensation programs for the next five to seven years. However, a change in business conditions, Company strategy, the growth of our businesses, organically and by acquisitions, or equity market performance, could alter this projection.

Features of the 2015 Plan that Benefit our Shareholders

The 2015 Plan includes the following features that we believe will enhance our ability to retain and to attract talented personnel and provisions that that we believe reflect the best current compensation practices and that are designed to implement governance-related protections for our shareholders.

Ability to Offer a Variety of Stock Incentive Awards. The variety of Stock Incentive Awards that will be available under the 2015 Plan will give us flexibility to respond to market-competitive changes in equity compensation practices.

30

The Ability to Provide a New Equity Incentive Plan that Reflects Best Current Compensation Practices. We have included provisions in the 2015 Plan that we believe reflect the best current compensation practices and that implement strong governance-related protections for our shareholders including:

Summary of the 2015 Stock Incentive Plan

The following summary highlights the significant terms of the 2015 Plan. This summary does not contain all of the information contained in the 2015 Plan, which is set forth in full asExhibit D to this Proxy Statement. To the extent there is a conflict between this summary and the terms of the 2015 Plan, the terms of the 2015 Plan will govern.

Purposes. The purposes of the 2015 Plan are (a) to enhance our ability to attract and retain the services of officers and other key employees, directors and outside service providers, (b) to provide additional incentives to such persons to devote their effort and skills to the advancement of the Company by providing them an opportunity to

31

participate in the ownership of the Company, and (c) to more closely align their interests with the interests of our shareholders by rewarding performance that results in increases in our share prices.

Limitations on Awards. Subject to any adjustments for stock splits and other similar changes in our capital structure, (a) no more than 600,000 shares may be issued pursuant to the exercise of incentive stock options; (b) no participant in the 2015 Plan may be granted options or SARs during any 12-month period during the term of the 2015 Plan with respect to more than 250,000 shares (increased to 400,000 with respect to awards granted during the first calendar year of employment) and (c) in the case of restricted stock awards, RSUs, performance awards or stock bonus awards that are intended to comply with the performance-based exception under Section 162(m) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code, if applicable, and are denominated in shares, no more than 100,000 shares may be earned for each 12 months in the vesting period or performance period (increased to 200,000 with respect to awards during the first calendar year of employment). These limits are intended to ensure that awards will qualify under Section 162(m) of the Code, if applicable. Failure to qualify under Section 162(m) might result in our inability to take a tax deduction for part of our performance-based compensation to senior executives. In addition, during any calendar year no participant may be granted cash-based awards that are intended to comply with the performance-based exception under Section 162(m) of the Code and are denominated in cash under which more than $2,000,000 may be earned for each 12 months in the performance period (increased to $4,000,000 with respect to awards granted during the first calendar of employment).

Eligible Participants.Incentive stock options may be granted only to employees of the Company or its subsidiaries. All other Awards may be granted to any of our officers, other employees and directors, and to outside service providers that render bona fide services not in connection with the offer and sale of securities in a capital-raising transaction. The compensation committee determines which individuals will participate in the 2015 Plan. As of September 14, 2015, there were approximately 260 employees and 7 non-employee directors eligible to participate in the 2015 Plan.

Adjustments. If the number of outstanding shares of the Company is changed by a stock dividend, extraordinary dividends or distributions (whether in cash, shares or other property, other than a regular cash dividend), recapitalization, stock split, reverse stock split, subdivision, combination, reclassification, spin-off or similar change in our capital structure, then (a) the number of shares reserved for issuance and future grant under the 2015 Plan, (b) the exercise prices of and number of shares subject to outstanding options and stock appreciation rights, (c) the number of shares subject to other outstanding awards, (d) the maximum number of shares that may be issued as incentive stock options or other awards and, (e) the maximum number of shares that may be issued to an individual or to a new employee in any one calendar year, will be proportionately adjusted, subject to any required action by our board of directors or our shareholders and in compliance with applicable securities laws. No fraction of shares may be issued following any adjustment.

Award Types. The 2015 Plan permits the issuance of the following types of Equity Incentive Awards:

32

Terms applicable to Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights. The exercise or base price of grants made under the 2015 Plan of stock options or SARs may not be less than the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. The term of these awards may not be longer than ten years, except in the case of incentive stock options granted to holders of more than 10% of our voting power, which may have a term no longer than five years. The compensation committee determines at the time of grant the other terms and conditions applicable to such award, including vesting and exercisability.

Terms applicable to Restricted Stock Awards, RSU Awards, Performance Awards and Stock Bonus Awards. The compensation committee determines the terms and conditions applicable to the granting of restricted stock awards, RSUs, performance awards and stock bonus awards. The compensation committee may make the grant, issuance, retention and/or vesting of such awards contingent upon continued employment or service, the passage of time, or such performance criteria or goals and the level of achievement versus such criteria as it deems appropriate.

Non-Employee Directors. Under the 2015 Plan, non-employee directors may be granted awards either on a discretionary basis or pursuant to policies adopted by our Board of Directors, except that no non-employee director may be granted awards in any calendar year with a grant date fair value of more than $800,000 (increased to $1,600,000 with respect to awards granted during the first calendar year of service).

Administration.The compensation committee will administer the 2015 Plan. Subject to the terms and limitations expressly set forth in the 2015 Plan, the compensation committee selects the persons who receive awards, determines the number of shares covered thereby, and establishes the terms, conditions and other provisions of Incentive Awards. The compensation committee may construe and interpret the 2015 Plan and prescribe, amend and rescind any rules and regulations relating to the 2015 Plan.

Eligibility Under Section 162(m) of the Code and Section 16 of the Exchange Act. Section 162(m) of the Code generally disallows a federal income tax deduction to public companies for compensation paid to the Chief Executive Officer and the three other most highly compensated officers, other than the Chief Financial Officer (“covered employees”), to the extent that any of them receive more than $1.0 million in compensation in any single year. However, if compensation qualifies as performance-based compensation for Section 162(m) purposes, a public company may deduct the compensation for federal income tax purposes even if the compensation exceeds $1.0 million in a single year.

Our 2015 Plan permits the grant of performance-based stock and cash awards that may qualify as performance-based compensation that are not subject to the $1.0 million limitation on income tax deductibility imposed by Section 162(m) of the Code. In addition to the grant of options or SARs that are deemed to be performance-based if issued with an exercise price no less than the fair market value on the date of grant, our compensation committee may structure awards so that the stock or cash will be issued or paid only following the achievement of certain pre-established performance goals during a designated performance period.

The 2015 Plan is intended to comply with the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Code in order that performance-based awards in excess of $1.0 million payable to covered employees may be deductible by us. However, while our compensation committee is mindful of the benefit to us of the full deductibility of compensation and will consider deductibility when analyzing potential compensation alternatives, the committee believes that it should not be constrained by the requirements of Section 162(m), where those requirements would impair flexibility in compensating our executive officers in a manner that can best promote our corporate objectives.

33

Awards may, but need not, include performance criteria that satisfy Section 162(m) of the Code. To the extent that awards are intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m), the performance criteria may include any of the factors selected by the compensation committee and specified in an award, from among the following objective measures, either individually, alternatively or in any combination, applied to us as a whole or any business unit or subsidiary, either individually, alternatively or in any combination, on a GAAP or non-GAAP basis, and measured, to the extent applicable on an absolute basis or relative to a pre-established target or index or group of comparator companies, to determine whether the performance goals established by the compensation committee with respect to applicable awards have been satisfied:

Performance goals will be set by the compensation committee prior to the earlier of (i) 90 days after the commencement of the applicable performance period and or (ii) the expiration of 25% of the performance period, and will otherwise comply with the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Code and the regulations thereunder. When required by Section 162(m) of the Code, prior to settlement of any award at least two of the outside directors then serving on the compensation committee (or a majority if more than two “outside directors” then serve on the compensation committee) will determine and certify in writing the extent to which such performance goals have been timely achieved and the extent to which the award has been earned, and the compensation committee may adjust downwards, but not upwards, the amount payable pursuant to the award. Awards granted to participants who are subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act must be approved by two or more “non-employee directors” (as defined in the regulations promulgated under Section 16 of the Exchange Act). With respect to participants whose compensation is subject to Section 162(m) of the Code, the compensation committee may specify at the time of the initial grant of the award, the manner of adjustment of any performance goals upon which vesting or settlement of any portion of the award is to be subject, if and to the extent necessary to prevent dilution or enlargement of any award as a result of extraordinary events or circumstances, as determined by the compensation committee, or to exclude the effects of an event or occurrence which the compensation committee determines should appropriately be excluded, including extraordinary, unusual, infrequent, or non-recurring items, an event either not directly related to our operations or not within the reasonable control of our management, changes in applicable laws, regulations or accounting principles or standards, currency fluctuations, discontinued operations, non-cash items, such as amortization, depreciation or reserves, asset impairment or any recapitalization, restructuring, reorganization, merger, acquisition, divestiture, consolidation, spin-off, split-up, combination, liquidation, dissolution, sale of assets or other similar corporate transaction, but only to the extent such adjustments would be permitted under Section 162(m) of the Code.

Changes of Control and Certain Other Corporate Transactions.In the event of a change of control, merger, sale of all or substantially all of our assets or other similar corporate transaction, unless otherwise determined by the compensation committee, all outstanding awards may be assumed or replaced by the successor corporation. In the

34

alternative, the successor corporation may substitute equivalent awards or provide substantially similar consideration to participants as was provided to shareholders (after taking into account the existing provisions of the awards). The successor corporation may also issue, in place of outstanding shares held by the participant, substantially similar shares or other property subject to repurchase restrictions no less favorable to the participant. In the event such successor or acquiring corporation (if any) refuses to assume, convert, replace or substitute awards, then the awards will have their vesting accelerate as to all shares subject to such award (and any applicable right of repurchase fully lapse) immediately prior to the consummation of the corporate transaction. In addition, in the event such successor or acquiring corporation (if any) refuses to assume, convert, replace or substitute awards, then the compensation committee will notify the participants that such award will be exercisable for a period of time determined by the compensation committee, and such awards will terminate upon the expiration of such period. Awards need not be treated similarly in a change of control or any other such transaction.

Method of Payment.The exercise price of options and the purchase price, if any, of other stock awards may be paid in cash or by check or, where expressly approved by the compensation committee and permitted by law, cancellation of indebtedness, surrender or cancellation of shares, waiver of compensation, a broker-assisted or other form of cashless exercise program, any combination of the foregoing or any other method permitted by applicable law.

Transferability.Except as otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee, awards granted under the 2015 Plan may not be sold, pledged, assigned, hypothecated, transferred or disposed of except by will or the laws of descent and distribution or pursuant a domestic relations order.

Repricing Prohibited. Repricing, or reducing the exercise price of outstanding options or SARs, or cancelling in exchange for cash outstanding options or SARs when the exercise price per share exceeds the fair market value of one share is prohibited without shareholder approval under the 2015 Plan.

Term. The 2015 Plan will terminate 10 years from the date our board of directors approved it, unless the Board decides to terminate it sooner. The effectiveness of the 2015 Plan is subject to approval of the 2015 Plan by our shareholders within twelve (12) months following the date our board of directors approved it.

Amendments. Our Board of Directors may amend the 2015 Plan at any time, provided that no action may be taken by our Board of Directors (except for adjustment for stock splits and other similar changes in our capital structure described in “Adjustments” above) without the approval of our shareholders to:

Insider Trading Policy. Any participant that receives an award under the 2015 Plan must comply with our insider trading policy.

Clawback or Recoupment. Awards received under the 2015 Plan will be subject to clawback or recoupment pursuant to any compensation clawback or recoupment policy adopted by our Board of Directors or required by law. Our Board of Directors has adopted an incentive compensation clawback policy, a copy of which can be found in the Investor Relations section of our website at www.ff-inc.com. See also, “Corporate Governance Principles and Policies – Incentive Compensation Clawback Policy” earlier in this proxy statement.

U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences

The following is a general summary as of the date of this Proxy Statement of the United States federal income tax consequences to us and participants in the 2015 Plan. The federal tax laws may change and the federal, state and local tax consequences for any participant will depend upon his or her individual circumstances. Each participant has been, and is, encouraged to seek the advice of a qualified tax advisor regarding the tax consequences of participation in the 2015 Plan.

35

Non-Qualified Stock Options. A participant in the 2015 Plan (a “participant”) will realize no taxable income at the time a non-qualified stock option is granted under the 2015 Plan, but generally at the time such non-qualified stock option is exercised, the participant will realize ordinary income in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise over the stock option exercise price. Upon a disposition of such shares, the difference between the amount received and the fair market value on the date of exercise will generally be treated as a long-term or short-term capital gain or loss, depending on the holding period of the shares. We will generally be entitled to a deduction for federal income tax purposes at the same time and in the same amount as the participant is considered to have realized ordinary income in connection with the exercise of the non-qualified stock option.

Incentive Stock Options. A participant will realize no taxable income, and we will not be entitled to any related deduction, at the time any incentive stock option is granted. If certain employment conditions are satisfied, then no taxable income will result upon the exercise of such option, and we will not be entitled to any deduction in connection with the exercise of such stock option. Upon disposition of the shares after expiration of the statutory holding periods, any gain realized by a participant will be taxed as long-term capital gain and any loss sustained will be long-term capital loss, and we will not be entitled to a deduction in respect to such disposition. While no ordinary taxable income is recognized at exercise (unless there is a “disqualifying disposition,” see below), the excess of the fair market value of the shares over the stock option exercise price is a preference item that is recognized for alternative minimum tax purposes.

Except in the event of death, if shares acquired by a participant upon the exercise of an incentive stock option are disposed of by such participant before the expiration of the statutory holding periods (i.e., a “disqualifying disposition”), such participant will be considered to have realized as compensation taxed as ordinary income in the year of such disposition an amount, not exceeding the gain realized on such disposition, equal to the difference between the stock option exercise price and the fair market value of such shares on the date of exercise of such stock option. Generally, any gain realized on the disposition in excess of the amount treated as compensation or any loss realized on the disposition will constitute capital gain or loss, respectively. If a participant makes a “disqualifying disposition,” generally in the fiscal year of such “disqualifying disposition” we will be allowed a deduction for federal income tax purposes in an amount equal to the compensation realized by such participant.

Restricted Stock. A participant receiving restricted stock may be taxed in one of two ways: the participant (i) pays tax when the restrictions lapse (i.e., with respect to the shares as they become vested) or (ii) makes an election under Section 83(b) of the Code to pay tax in the year the grant is made with respect to all of the shares subject to the grant. At either time the value of the award for tax purposes is the excess of the fair market value of the shares at that time over the amount (if any) paid for the shares. This value is taxed as ordinary income and if granted to an employee, is subject to income tax withholding. We receive a tax deduction at the same time and for the same amount taxable to the participant. If a participant makes an election under Section 83(b) of the Code to be taxed at grant, then, when the restrictions lapse, there will be no further tax consequences attributable to the awarded stock until the recipient disposes of the stock, at which point any gain or loss will be short-term or long-term capital gain or loss, depending on the holding period of the stock prior to such disposition.

Stock Bonuses. The participant will not realize income when a stock bonus (which can be settled in cash or our common stock) is granted, but will realize ordinary income when shares (or cash, if cash settled) are transferred to him or her. The amount of such income will be equal to the fair market value of such transferred shares (or cash, if cash settled) on the date of transfer. We generally will be entitled to a tax deduction at the time and in the amount that the participant recognizes ordinary income.

Stock Appreciation Rights. A grant of a SAR (which can be settled in cash or our common stock) has no federal income tax consequences at the time of grant. Upon the exercise of SARs, the value received is generally taxable to the recipient as ordinary income, and we generally will be entitled to a corresponding tax deduction.

Restricted Stock Units. In general, no taxable income is realized upon the grant of an RSU (which can be settled in cash or our common stock). The participant will generally include in ordinary income the fair market value of the award of stock (or cash, if cash settled) at the time shares of stock (or cash, if cash settled) are delivered to the participant or at the time the RSU. We generally will be entitled to a tax deduction at the time and in the amount that the participant recognizes ordinary income.

36

Performance Awards. The participant will not realize income when a performance award is granted (which can be settled in cash or our common stock), but will realize ordinary income when shares (or cash, if cash settled) are transferred to him or her. The amount of such income will be equal to the fair market value of such transferred shares (or cash, if cash settled) on the date of transfer. We generally will be entitled to a tax deduction at the time and in the amount that the participant recognizes ordinary income.

Withholding Tax Requirements. Whenever shares are to be issued in satisfaction of awards granted under the 2015 Plan or the applicable tax event occurs, we may require the participant to remit to us an amount sufficient to satisfy applicable withholding tax requirements. Whenever payments in satisfaction of an award are to be made in cash, such payment will be net of an amount sufficient to satisfy the applicable withholding tax requirements. The compensation committee may require or permit the participant to satisfy applicable withholding tax requirements, in whole or in part by paying cash, electing to have us withhold otherwise deliverable cash or shares having a fair market value equal to the minimum statutory amount required to be withheld (or such other amount that will not cause an adverse accounting consequence or cost), delivering to us already-owned shares having a fair market value equal to the minimum amount required to be withheld or withholding from the proceeds of the sale of otherwise deliverable shares acquired pursuant to an award either through a voluntary sale or through a mandatory sale arranged by us.

ERISA Information

The 2015 Plan is not subject to any of the provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended.

Required Vote

Approval of this Proposal requires the affirmative vote of the majority of the shares present and voted on this Proposal at the Annual Meeting.

BOARD RECOMMENDATION

OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR”

THIS PROPOSAL NO. 4 TO APPROVE THE 2015 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN.

37

RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

(Proposal No. 5)2)

The Audit Committee of our Board of Directors has selected Vavrinek, Trine, Day & Co., LLP (“Vavrinek”) as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2015.2017. Vavrinek audited our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20142016 and the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting at December 31, 2014.2016. A representative of Vavrinek is expected to attend the Annual Meeting and will be afforded an opportunity to make a statement and to respond to appropriate questions from shareholdersstockholders in attendance at the Annual Meeting.

Audit and Other Fees Paid in Fiscal Year 20142016 and 20132015

Aggregate fees for professional services rendered to the Company by VTDVavrinek were as follows for the years ended December 31:

Audit Services. In each of the years ended December 31, 20142016 and 2013, VTD2015, Vavrinek rendered audit services which consisted of the audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the years then ended.

Audit Related Services. VTDVavrinek did not render any other audit related services to us during 20142016 or 2013.2015.

Tax Services. VTDVavrinek did not render any tax services to us during 20142016 or 2013.2015.

Other Services. VTDOther than comfort letter opinions related to the Company’s public offerings, Vavrinek did not render any other professional or any consulting services to us during 20142016 or 2013.2015.

Audit and Non-Audit Services Pre-Approval Policy

The Audit Committee’s Chartercharter provides that the Audit Committee must pre-approve services to be performed by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. In accordance with that requirement, the Audit Committee pre-approved the engagement of VTDVavrinek pursuant to which it provided the services described above for the fiscal years ended December 31, 20142016 and 2013.2015.

Proposal to Ratify the Appointment of our Independent Registered Public Accountants

A proposal will be presented at the Annual Meeting to ratify the Audit Committee’s appointment of VTDVavrinek as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2015.2017. Although ratification by the shareholdersstockholders is not a prerequisite to the power and authority of the Audit Committee to appoint VTDVavrinek as the Company’s independent registered public accountants, the Audit Committee considers such ratification to be desirable. In the event of a negative vote on such ratification, the Audit Committee will reconsider this appointment. Even if the appointment is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may direct the appointment of a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the fiscal 20152017 if the Audit Committee deems such a change to be in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders.stockholders.

Vote Required and Board Recommendation

Approval of this Proposal requires the affirmative vote of the majority of the shares present and voted on this Proposal at the Annual Meeting.

The Board of Directors Unanimously Recommends that you Vote “FOR” Ratification of the Appointment of

Vavrinek, Trine, Day & Co., LLP as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for Fiscal 2015

38

ADJOURNMENT PROPOSAL

(Proposal No. 6)

The Board of Directors believes that approval of the Share Increase Amendment (Proposal No. 2) and the Reincorporation Proposal (Proposal No. 3) are in the best interests of our shareholders and is recommending that all of the shareholders vote their shares for approval of both of those Proposals. Approval of each of those Proposals requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the Company’s outstanding shares. As a result, shares that are not voted on these Proposals will have the same effect as a vote against the Proposals.

The Board of believes that it would unfair to those shareholders who have taken the time to vote to approve the Share Increase Amendment and the Reincorporation Proposal, if the votes received for approval of those Proposals were to fall short of that required vote because some of the shareholders had unintentionally failed to vote their shares.

In order to prevent just such a result, the Board of directors is asking that shareholders vote to approve the Adjournment Proposal to permit the Annual Meeting to be adjourned, on one or more occasions as the Board deems necessary or appropriate, to a later date or dates in order to enable the Board to continue soliciting proxies for approval of the Share Increase Amendment and the Reincorporation Proposal.

Approval of this Adjournment Proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares voted, in person or by proxy, on this Proposal at the Annual Meeting.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT SHAREHOLDERS VOTE

“FOR” APPROVAL OF THIS ADJOURNMENT PROPOSAL

39

COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

We believe that the success of our business and the creation of long term shareholderstockholder value depend to a large extent on our ability to retain and to attract superior management employees. Therefore, the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors (the “compensation committee”“Compensation Committee”) endeavors to ensure that the compensation of our executive officers is competitive and consistent with market conditions in order to enable us to attract and retain key executives critical to the Company’s long-term success and the achievement of sustained increases in stock value. Therefore, when reviewing and approving both the types and amounts of compensation to be paid to our named executive officers, or NEOs,(“NEOs”), as well as other key management employees, the committee seeks to achieve the following objectives: